rondronron Says:
Sep 29, 2008 - S T U P I D ! ! ! The seat of the European Parliament in Strasbourg is not something with what you can joke, it's a political problem not an economic one: the choice of this symbolic city means that all european citizens make the choice of Peace: you are ridiculous with your helmets ! impostors !
rondronron Says:
Sep 29, 2008 - S T U P I D ! ! ! The seat of the European Parliament in Strasbourg is not something with what you can joke, it's a political problem not an economic one: the choice of this symbolic city means that all european citizens make the choice of Peace: you are ridiculous with your helmets ! impostors !
winne1500 Says:
Sep 30, 2008 - Rondronron, what's more important? The symbol you're talking about or the impact on the EU budget and environment?Sorry for disagreeing with you, but at least one of those citizens (me, for instance) did not make any choice at all.All that money used to send the cantines and the staff back and forth from Brussels to Strasbourg, to put a second office (included computers and printers, heating, electricity) could better be invested in some economically and socially justified projects.
athan90 Says:
Oct 5, 2008 - The decision to install the European Parliament in Brussels has not had much to do with symbolic glorification of peace after WWII. In fact it's been cheap and easy to have it there because they could use the building of the Council of Europe. After all cheap and easy has changed slightly throughout the years and it now means Brussels. So why not just move there?And by the way why is Strasbourg so much more important and symbolic than Brussels? The Belgians suffered at lot too!
boyboy20225 Says:
Sep 27, 2008 - Cooles Video! Vielleicht sollte das EU-Parlament die 200 Mio Euro, welche durch den hoffentlich baldigen Wegfall des Umzugszirkusses gespart werden, einfach in die Sanierung der Parlamentsbauten in Brüssel investieren. ;) Wäre damit nicht allen geholfen?